Skip to main content

What Is Learning? The Debate That Should Not Continue

        It seems that our nation, and possibly the world, are in the throws of a debate of what education should look like and ultimately what learning really is.  Granted, change is always difficult.  And although it seems education or learning should always be about change, growth and adaptation, we can also safely say that it’s also about tradition, compliance, control and power.
     In addition to the standard debates about educational reforms, there are two other forces contributing to the newer level of debate.  First, technology has become so dominant and influential in all aspects of the world economically, socially and politically, that education can no longer ignore technology or attempt to work outside of it.  Two, the impact of the changing global economy are finally becoming a reality.  The nature of jobs and employment is dramatically being altered so fast that all educational entities are being forced to reckon with what it all means.
         In an attempt to boil it down, this is a summary of the major divide in education: Does one learn better through a highly structured, top down approach (teacher delivering content or info, students taking notes and ultimately regurgitating the information back on tests, etc.) or by doing real world work (project-based, bottom up, student-directed, etc.)?
           To me, it seems almost tragic that we’re still really struggling with this or having a debate at all.  How complicated can it be?  Haven’t we always known that learning by doing is far superior?  Education researchers have documented over and over that lecture and teacher directed instruction (listening, notes, etc.) is by far the lowest form of learning.  And simultaneously, that learning by doing/student-directed learning (project-based featuring choices, ownerships, etc.) is ultimately closest to the highest form of learning? 
             So, why do we still debate?  Why is our system so slow to change? First, as a student yourself, how did your learn best?  What learning experiences were the most memorable, meaningful and applicable?  My estimation is that most individuals would reflect on their own learning and identify the highest or most valuable forms as ones related to ultimately doing something vs. passively taking something.
 Does the problem come from academia?  Learning at one time was directed and operated by the great thinkers who bestowed their wisdom and knowledge on the masses right?  Indeed, much of our university traditions still come from this where we put hundreds of people in a lecture hall to be enlightened.

What if we ask all of us to reflect on our educations?  For those of us that went to college, what was the real learning that took place?  Wasn’t it when we entered our major and began doing things directly related to our careers? Wasn’t it about of us doing rather than just listening?
Why are electives always so popular and successful? Choice and more learning by doing are typically the answers or rationale.  Science teachers always got it right.  They had labs and hands-on activities.  We’ve had field trips in schools forever because we realized that learning came to life when it was real, hands-on and participatory.
 Most of are familiar with the term On-The-Job Training or OTJ.  And if you ask most professionals about how they learned to perform their jobs or careers, despite their educational level or experience, they will tell you that it was on-the-job.  And most professions have experiences such as internships or externships as well because they know that the real or higher level of learning will take place by doing it in the real world.
Promoting anything but project-based education or learning by doing just doesn’t make sense.  Both experts and lay people, if being truly honest, know the difference and the truth here.  And if it’s so obvious, how could still be debating or resisting universal change?  I hesitate to say, but fear that it’s about tradition, cost, control, ownership and maybe even laziness.  Probably all of these are inexcusable.  Sadly, we have taught one another some bad examples of learning and education and they remain part of our national and personal psyches for some time.   I do see universal change coming and it’s about time.  Real learning is in front of us everyday.


  1. Very cool Mike! I will be sharing with my staff at our next PLC!



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Ways To Make All Students Into Lead Learners (Teachers)

It has been established long ago that the highest form of learning is teaching. When one is put in the position to teach others, one learns the content and concepts at the highest applied level in order to successfully communicate it to others. This reality has led many educators long ago to turn as much of the instruction in their classroom over to students through student presentations, projects and more. That being said, too many students still never have this opportunity to become Lead Learners - where they learn at the highest level by having the responsibility of teaching others. Here are five ways all educators can expand the opportunity for all students to learn at the highest level by all becoming teachers: STUDENTS AS PROFESSIONAL PRESENTERS
Again, students have been giving presentations in many cases for years in certain courses. I suppose even the early  years of Show & Tell were intended to have every student present, or tell a story. Well, we need to challenge all of ou…

10 Things That Must Change About Educators, Education

There are hundreds of things written daily regarding changes, reforms and new research in the profession of education. But much of this comes from outside entities (researchers, politicians, parents, leaders and others) aimed at educators. It’s time for educators to own the changes, thus owning the profession. We need to truly flip the whole concept of what it means to teach and be a true teacher.This can apply to all educators who understand that we have to redefine the profession.
     Here are my 10 things that must change about the profession and the practitioners:

Professionalism - Teachers need to claim and lead the professional standards of their own profession. Just like in the profession of law enforcement, the system cannot tolerate or endure bad professionals. Cops need to police their own and so do teachers. For too long, we have collectively accepted that there are going to be a certain percentage of just plain “bad” teachers. The fact is that they not only harm the profes…

Let's Drop 'College Ready' and Be 'Career Ready'

Education may not consistently be good at many things. But, it does seem to be great at both acronyms (CTE, PBL, EDI, ELL, SPED, PLC and so on)  and catch phrases (21st century learning, personalized learning, future ready). One of the more popular catchphrases as of late is College & Career Ready. Indeed, the ‘Career’ part is a more recent addition. For years, we really just said (and lived) College Ready. I’m here to suggest it’s time to drop the College Ready and only use Career Ready. Don’t get me wrong. I do think almost everyone needs some sort of post-secondary training, especially in our new globalized economy. But I am suggesting that we use Career Ready only knowing that one’s career path should dictate their post-secondary education or training path. Additionally, it will allow us to focus on the requisite skills and planning required for young people to have lifelong employability in the 21st century. One of the early questions to me is what does college ready really me…