Skip to main content

What Is Learning? The Debate That Should Not Continue

        It seems that our nation, and possibly the world, are in the throws of a debate of what education should look like and ultimately what learning really is.  Granted, change is always difficult.  And although it seems education or learning should always be about change, growth and adaptation, we can also safely say that it’s also about tradition, compliance, control and power.
     In addition to the standard debates about educational reforms, there are two other forces contributing to the newer level of debate.  First, technology has become so dominant and influential in all aspects of the world economically, socially and politically, that education can no longer ignore technology or attempt to work outside of it.  Two, the impact of the changing global economy are finally becoming a reality.  The nature of jobs and employment is dramatically being altered so fast that all educational entities are being forced to reckon with what it all means.
         In an attempt to boil it down, this is a summary of the major divide in education: Does one learn better through a highly structured, top down approach (teacher delivering content or info, students taking notes and ultimately regurgitating the information back on tests, etc.) or by doing real world work (project-based, bottom up, student-directed, etc.)?
           To me, it seems almost tragic that we’re still really struggling with this or having a debate at all.  How complicated can it be?  Haven’t we always known that learning by doing is far superior?  Education researchers have documented over and over that lecture and teacher directed instruction (listening, notes, etc.) is by far the lowest form of learning.  And simultaneously, that learning by doing/student-directed learning (project-based featuring choices, ownerships, etc.) is ultimately closest to the highest form of learning? 

             So, why do we still debate?  Why is our system so slow to change? First, as a student yourself, how did your learn best?  What learning experiences were the most memorable, meaningful and applicable?  My estimation is that most individuals would reflect on their own learning and identify the highest or most valuable forms as ones related to ultimately doing something vs. passively taking something.
 Does the problem come from academia?  Learning at one time was directed and operated by the great thinkers who bestowed their wisdom and knowledge on the masses right?  Indeed, much of our university traditions still come from this where we put hundreds of people in a lecture hall to be enlightened.

What if we ask all of us to reflect on our educations?  For those of us that went to college, what was the real learning that took place?  Wasn’t it when we entered our major and began doing things directly related to our careers? Wasn’t it about of us doing rather than just listening?
Why are electives always so popular and successful? Choice and more learning by doing are typically the answers or rationale.  Science teachers always got it right.  They had labs and hands-on activities.  We’ve had field trips in schools forever because we realized that learning came to life when it was real, hands-on and participatory.

 Most of are familiar with the term On-The-Job Training or OTJ.  And if you ask most professionals about how they learned to perform their jobs or careers, despite their educational level or experience, they will tell you that it was on-the-job.  And most professions have experiences such as internships or externships as well because they know that the real or higher level of learning will take place by doing it in the real world.

Promoting anything but project-based education or learning by doing just doesn’t make sense.  Both experts and lay people, if being truly honest, know the difference and the truth here.  And if it’s so obvious, how could still be debating or resisting universal change?  I hesitate to say, but fear that it’s about tradition, cost, control, ownership and maybe even laziness.  Probably all of these are inexcusable.  Sadly, we have taught one another some bad examples of learning and education and they remain part of our national and personal psyches for some time.   I do see universal change coming and it’s about time.  Real learning is in front of us everyday.


  1. Very cool Mike! I will be sharing with my staff at our next PLC!



Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Ways To Make All Students Into Lead Learners (Teachers)

It has been established long ago that the highest form of learning is teaching. When one is put in the position to teach others, one learns the content and concepts at the highest applied level in order to successfully communicate it to others.
     This reality has led many educators long ago to turn as much of the instruction in their classroom over to students through student presentations, projects and more.
     That being said, too many students still never have this opportunity to become Lead Learners - where they learn at the highest level by having the responsibility of teaching others. Here are five ways all educators can expand the opportunity for all students to learn at the highest level by all becoming teachers:

STUDENTS AS PROFESSIONAL PRESENTERS      Again, students have been giving presentations in many cases for years in certain courses. I suppose even the early years of Show & Tell were intended to have every student present, or tell a story. Well, we need to ch…

8 Lessons From The FFA For All Of Education

I was never an Agriculture or FFA student. Indeed, I have never been an Ag or FFA teacher. I have never taken an Ag Science or Ag Elective class. Actually, aside from eating food produced by the Ag industry, I’ve never even done much of anything related to the work that the Ag Community does.
     However, as the former principal of Minarets High School, I got to witness and be a part of the great work that the FFA does, and has always done, that we can all learn from.
     In fact, it seems that much of what we are trying to do with 21st century education and skill development, the FFA has always done. When it comes to what industry and the economy seems to be demanding from our students, the FFA has seemingly incorporated all of it from day one.
     When I became the principal of Minarets High School (Minarets High School) in 2008, the school did not exist yet. We were tasked, among other things, with having a dynamic Ag Science & Natural Resources Pathway. With that in m…

If We're Banning Phones, We Won't Connect Our Students To The Future

For those of us that follow the news, especially education news, we don’t have to wait very long for an educator, or educators, to give us the excuse for a blog post. This week’s winner goes to the principal and staff at Korematsu Middle School in California’s East Bay Area.
     They were recently featured, and apparently heralded, by an article in Ed Source ( for their recent compliance and control upgrade that bans students from using their cell phones at lunch and during their free time.
     According to principal Matthew Burnham, they tried to let the 7th and 8th grade students use their cell phones last year during these times and it was, according to them, an abysmal failure. The school claims that due to the students being “glued” to their cell phones, no one was talking and interacting with one another. And after watching the movie “Screenagers” and drinking from that proverbial firehose of biased information, this school was trying to …