Skip to main content

Project-Based Education Demands a Different Type of Student....And Some Will Resist

      As we know, education has traditionally been teacher-driven vs. student driven.  Whether it was the factory model that we had for decades, or even the high stakes bubble test environment, both students and teachers understood the game.  Teachers drove the instruction and learning, while students learned to play the game. 

     For students, the game was compliance.  The more students essentially kept their mouths shut, did the work, completed tasks on time and followed instructions, the better they did.  In the end, it was not about critical thinking, creativity, divergent ideas, or anything else related to what we inherently know was “actual learning.” 

      The problem is that students learned to accept and even perfect this game.  Students did not have to invest themselves into their learning.  It wasn’t about their ideas, their voice, their choice or their engagement.  And as ultimately counter-productive or now out-of-step as this seems, this is how we trained our students.  Some never bought in or performed in that environment either, but everyone understood the game and knew what it would take to succeed if that was a goal.

     Flash forward to our second decade in the 21st century.  The game is dramatically changing.  Whether its is because of new standards, the advent of technology, or the changing nature of jobs and the global economy, the learning world is now asking students to do something very different.  Indeed, they are requiring them and demanding them to do more. 

     Education is now asking students to generate ideas and share them.  We are asking them to collaborate with teams in their classes and even beyond.  We are asking them to be public (present, publish, etc.).  This represents a very different type of learning expectation and ultimately a very different type of student.



      No longer is it just about compliance, completed homework, high grades and scores.  Students will have to invest themselves.  In the end, they will have to do more and not less and the rules will be different.  Some students may not like that. 

    Don’t get me wrong.  Many students have been waiting for years to unleash their creativity and were not bought into what it took to be successful in the previous model or models.  But while there have been many who were dying to produce and share relevant, real world work, there are maybe just as many who were glad that they didn’t have to.
 
      For example, what is ultimately easier?  Completing a worksheet and turning in for points towards a grade or having to come with an idea an see it through? Well, obviously, the first one is much easier.  In the end, it demands very little from the student.  Even it is a long or complicated worksheet assignment, a student does not have to be creative, collaborative or communicative.  And they certainly did not have to critically think. 

        But when you ask a student to come with an idea for a project and then pursue it all the way to fruition, they inherently know that it will require a great deal more from them.  Not only will it be ultimately more work, but it will also be more personal, more reflective, and more public.  And they may not like that.



     There could be many other challenges as we evolve this new type of student.  Previously, it was always easy to determine who was academic and who wasn’t, who was successful and who wasn’t, who was getting it and who wasn’t.  But now, it will less uniform and more individualized.  There will now be more than one way to be academic, be successful or even get it.  And again, some students may not like the new, more level playing field.

        When we get into real project-based education, there will be standards, expectations and rubrics, but there will be lots of diversity.  Instead of a system based on compliance, it will now be based on what level students are willing to invest personally.  As educators and the system continue to evolve, students will too.  But it will take time.  For some, years of training will have to be undone.  For others, the redefining of success and learning will be challenging. 
(photos courtesy of Minarets High School)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five Ways To Make All Students Into Lead Learners (Teachers)

It has been established long ago that the highest form of learning is teaching. When one is put in the position to teach others, one learns the content and concepts at the highest applied level in order to successfully communicate it to others.
     This reality has led many educators long ago to turn as much of the instruction in their classroom over to students through student presentations, projects and more.
     That being said, too many students still never have this opportunity to become Lead Learners - where they learn at the highest level by having the responsibility of teaching others. Here are five ways all educators can expand the opportunity for all students to learn at the highest level by all becoming teachers:

STUDENTS AS PROFESSIONAL PRESENTERS      Again, students have been giving presentations in many cases for years in certain courses. I suppose even the early years of Show & Tell were intended to have every student present, or tell a story. Well, we need to ch…

8 Lessons From The FFA For All Of Education

I was never an Agriculture or FFA student. Indeed, I have never been an Ag or FFA teacher. I have never taken an Ag Science or Ag Elective class. Actually, aside from eating food produced by the Ag industry, I’ve never even done much of anything related to the work that the Ag Community does.
     However, as the former principal of Minarets High School, I got to witness and be a part of the great work that the FFA does, and has always done, that we can all learn from.
     In fact, it seems that much of what we are trying to do with 21st century education and skill development, the FFA has always done. When it comes to what industry and the economy seems to be demanding from our students, the FFA has seemingly incorporated all of it from day one.
     When I became the principal of Minarets High School (Minarets High School) in 2008, the school did not exist yet. We were tasked, among other things, with having a dynamic Ag Science & Natural Resources Pathway. With that in m…

If We're Banning Phones, We Won't Connect Our Students To The Future

For those of us that follow the news, especially education news, we don’t have to wait very long for an educator, or educators, to give us the excuse for a blog post. This week’s winner goes to the principal and staff at Korematsu Middle School in California’s East Bay Area.
     They were recently featured, and apparently heralded, by an article in Ed Source (http://bit.ly/EdSourceCellPhones) for their recent compliance and control upgrade that bans students from using their cell phones at lunch and during their free time.
     According to principal Matthew Burnham, they tried to let the 7th and 8th grade students use their cell phones last year during these times and it was, according to them, an abysmal failure. The school claims that due to the students being “glued” to their cell phones, no one was talking and interacting with one another. And after watching the movie “Screenagers” and drinking from that proverbial firehose of biased information, this school was trying to …