Skip to main content

Creating Choice

    Most educators agree that higher level thinking and actually learning only takes place once there is ownership and buy-in on the part of the learner.  And that will only truly take place when CHOICE is available to the learner.  Traditionally, choice has been in the form of an elective course in high school, choosing our major in college, etc.

    But we need to take choice way beyond that.  Choice needs to be part of the the daily learning and educational activities. This can come in the form of choosing a specific school or program (like a charter school or specialty school), choosing an area of interest or focus and so on.  But again, how do we create choice in our daily educational pursuits?

     This is not a new idea.  Universities, researchers and most importantly, successful teacher, have been examining and implement choice in classrooms and learning for a long time.  Again, these are not new ideas.  Leaders like Alfie Kohn wrote about it 20 years ago ( and psychologists agree that motivation is innately linked to choice: as well).

     Again, to increase ownership and buy-in, and ultimately higher level thinking and learning, students need to have choices.  These can be choices on specific areas of study and focus in any course or required subject.  These can be project menus where students choose from a list of methodologies in terms of meeting a standard.  This could be whom we work with and when.  Collaboration is key and students have to have input on how that looks and feels.  How about choices on how to communicate with teachers, advisers and mentors?  Can the student text, direct message, call, etc. these important facilitators?

     What we have seen develop in the last 15 years or more is a lack of choice.  In secondary education, electives were reduced or even eliminated.  Options on how to meet a criteria or standard were streamlined or standardized.  Choice dissipated and so did student engagement and success.

     CCSS could move in a better direction.  But much of our system (A-G, core requirements, curriculum programs, etc.) are set-up to resist choice.  Indeed, it's not always natural for educators either.  When choice is presented, ownership is transferred from teacher to student.  Most of us know that this is important and successful, but not always easy and certainly not automatic by any means.

     The world and the future of work are changing dramatically.  Education will have to continue to evolve and change.  Offering students CHOICE is just the beginning, but true thinking and learning start there.


Popular posts from this blog

Evolutionary Education - 5 Things That Could Be Extinct Soon

It has often been uttered, that “only the fittest survive.” But when it comes to education, it seems things that might not even be that fit have continued to survive. However, just like in living species through time - dinosaurs, sabre tooth tigers and the wooly mammoth just to name a few - even things that have lived on for a long time eventually go extinct. So, with that in mind, it seems educational evolution is occurring too and extinction might be inevitable for a variety of standard educational pedagogy, tools and practices.
Textbooks/Single Source Curriculum: (this includes ebook textbooks too). Regardless of whether they are digital or not, depending on and surviving on one text as the foundational source of information and context - regardless of course, age group and purpose - seems almost prehistoric at this point. Information changes daily and resources are born every minute on line. Anyone doing serious academic work…

An Open Letter of Apology to the Class of 2018

Graduation is a natural and important time to reflect. It’s important for the graduates, but it’s also important for the rest of us. Our society has very few rites of passage more heralded that high school graduation. So, with yet another graduation season upon us, allow me the indulgence to reflect once again.

     For previous graduation seasons, reflections included the following: students we did and didn’t recognize, how we bombarded our graduates with rules and regulations vs. relationships and many other musings. This year, for the class of 2018, I offer you an Open Letter of Apology. That’s right. I’m sorry. Truth is that I have not worked directly with high school students since the class of 2014. I served previous classes from 2014 back for about 25 years or so. And although I didn’t serve you directly class of 2018, I have, behind the scenes, still been rooting for you and attempting to be your tireless champion.
     First, I’d like to tell you how impressed I am with …

If We're Banning Phones, We Won't Connect Our Students To The Future

For those of us that follow the news, especially education news, we don’t have to wait very long for an educator, or educators, to give us the excuse for a blog post. This week’s winner goes to the principal and staff at Korematsu Middle School in California’s East Bay Area.
     They were recently featured, and apparently heralded, by an article in Ed Source ( for their recent compliance and control upgrade that bans students from using their cell phones at lunch and during their free time.
     According to principal Matthew Burnham, they tried to let the 7th and 8th grade students use their cell phones last year during these times and it was, according to them, an abysmal failure. The school claims that due to the students being “glued” to their cell phones, no one was talking and interacting with one another. And after watching the movie “Screenagers” and drinking from that proverbial firehose of biased information, this school was trying to …