tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5243284269486433927.post952188307936895020..comments2023-11-16T01:50:06.868-08:00Comments on Edu Change & Student Advocacy: 21st Century Education Certification ChecklistEdu Change & Student Advocacyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08045086448860071310noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5243284269486433927.post-41040203584851979022016-09-10T05:23:05.718-07:002016-09-10T05:23:05.718-07:00@Jack You said test. You're not 21st century....@Jack You said test. You're not 21st century. ;)alfiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15926760954147457539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5243284269486433927.post-88620393443969235592016-09-05T17:45:28.251-07:002016-09-05T17:45:28.251-07:00Well said, and I enjoy the "bluntness". ...Well said, and I enjoy the "bluntness". I have some questions about the consistency of content in the absence of textbooks. At some point either content scope and sequence matters or s does not, but you can't have everybody picking and choosing what subject content kids get and then have a test that relies on them having certain content knowledge. And you can't toss kids into say, the relationship between the Chumash Indians and the Spanish Missionaries without them knowing why both groups were even there. The reason I mention this is because in these first three years of Common Core, districts did just that. I am incensed, however, that the first adoptions in my district included NO initial training in the tech components, which is definitely not 21st century, more like 1950. Jack Jarvishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02434576878056940358noreply@blogger.com